1. The man in the picture was pushed onto the tracks and wasn't strong enough to lift himself.
The photographer was present at that moment and tried after he was unable to help the man to warn the trains operator with his camera flash.
2. Because it was the only way for him helping the man. Also the newspapers published his picture a lot and headlines talked over him.
3. If I would be in his situation I wouldn't even think about taking a picture in that moment. In my opinion taking the pictures would be the last way to safe this mans life.
4. No I don't think he did the best he can, there are a lot of other possible ways to get help or even try to help the man. His first reaction was to take his camera out and shoot some pictures, that doesn't seem really helpful. Even if he was unable to help him he could scream for help or something.
5. In the viewpoint of the newspaper it was a great idea because people were really interested and the newspaper got attention with this interesting picture, but in the position of the man it wasn't the best decision because people didn't believe him that what he did was the best thing he could do to help the man.
6. In the most unmoral way and the job goes first over all a photographer would shoot those pictures , but in a moral way he would have helped him and at the end he would stand there as a hero and newspapers would report about him.
7. I think it is aceptable for private reasons like if you show your family where you traveld around, but especially in the newspaper photography and than mostly in political things its really risky to involve the photographer that much, because most pictures involve secret things or not the most beautiful faces of important persons.
8. No I think the newspapers get more interesting and real if they report about influencing events.
9. It wasn't enough time for him to be able to help the man, so he tried his best by using the flash of his camera.
No comments:
Post a Comment